Publication Ethics
Editorial and Publication Ethics
The AAFT Journal of Management is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics, integrity, and scholarly responsibility. The journal follows internationally recognized ethical guidelines to ensure transparency, quality, and credibility at every stage of the publication lifecycle, including submission, peer review, editing, and post-publication.
Editorship
Editors play a critical role in maintaining the academic quality and integrity of the journal. They are responsible for ensuring that all submitted manuscripts are evaluated fairly, objectively, and within a reasonable timeframe.
Editorial decisions are based solely on:
- Academic merit and originality
- Clarity and methodological rigor
- Relevance to the journal’s scope
Ethics
The journal requires all participants in the publication process to adhere to established ethical standards. Ethical publishing enhances the credibility of research and contributes to the advancement of knowledge.
Authors must ensure:
- Originality of work
- Accuracy in reporting data
- Ethical research practices
Reviewers and editors must act with integrity, fairness, and professionalism throughout the review process.
Transparency
Transparency is a fundamental principle of the journal’s operations. Clear and accessible information is provided regarding editorial policies, peer review procedures, and publication standards.
The journal ensures:
- Transparent editorial decisions
- Clear communication with authors and reviewers
- Accountability in the publication process
Plagiarism
The journal has a strict zero-tolerance policy toward plagiarism in any form. All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection tools.
Plagiarism includes:
- Copying text without proper citation
- Paraphrasing without acknowledgment
- Duplicate or redundant publication
- Data fabrication or manipulation
Any manuscript found guilty of plagiarism will be rejected or retracted.
Conflict of Interest
All authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any financial, professional, or personal relationships that could influence their work.
Conflicts may include:
- Financial support
- Institutional affiliations
- Personal relationships
Full disclosure ensures transparency and maintains trust in the publication process.
Informed Consent
For research involving human participants, authors must confirm that informed consent has been obtained.
Participants must:
- Be fully informed about the research
- Participate voluntarily
- Have the right to withdraw at any time
Confidentiality
The journal maintains strict confidentiality throughout the submission and review process.
Editors and reviewers must:
- Not disclose manuscript details
- Not use unpublished information for personal benefit
- Protect author identity in double-blind review
Funding Source
Authors must clearly disclose all sources of funding and financial support.
This includes:
- Funding agency name
- Grant numbers
- Role of the funder in the research
Transparency in funding helps identify potential biases.
Clinical Trials
All clinical trials must be registered in a recognized public registry prior to publication.
Authors must provide:
- Registration number
- Registry name
- Trial details
This ensures transparency and ethical compliance.
Human & Animal Research
Research involving humans or animals must comply with ethical standards and institutional guidelines.
Requirements include:
- Approval from ethics committees or IRBs
- Humane treatment of animals
- Protection of participant rights
Appeals
Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions if they believe an error has occurred.
Appeals must:
- Be submitted formally
- Include clear justification
- Provide supporting evidence
All appeals are reviewed fairly and transparently.
Citations
Authors must ensure proper acknowledgment of all sources used in their research.
Good citation practices:
- Credit original authors
- Avoid excessive or irrelevant citations
- Maintain consistency in referencing style
Reviewer Suggestions
Authors may suggest potential reviewers based on expertise.
However:
- Reviewers must be independent
- No conflicts of interest should exist
- Final selection is at the editor’s discretion
Data Availability
-
The journal encourages authors to ensure transparency and reproducibility of research findings.
Authors should:
- Share datasets in repositories
- Provide supplementary materials
- Include data availability statements
Post-publication
The journal is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record after publication.
Actions include:
- Addressing errors
- Investigating concerns
- Updating records when necessary
Corrections
Minor errors that do not affect the validity of the research are corrected through formal notices.
Examples include:
- Typographical errors
- Author details
- Minor data inconsistencies
Retractions
Retractions are issued when serious ethical violations or errors compromise the validity of the research.
Reasons may include:
- Plagiarism
- Data fabrication
- Ethical misconduct
Retracted articles are clearly marked.
Expressions of Concern
An expression of concern is issued when potential issues are identified but require further investigation.
This ensures:
- Transparency
- Awareness among readers
- Protection of the scholarly record